Reference data
What is a good DOTS score?
DOTS (Konertz, BVDK 2019) is the de-facto raw-open scoring standard on OpenPowerlifting and US raw federations like USPA — not an IPF formula (the IPF's own official coefficient since 2020 is IPF GoodLift). It gained ground because the older Wilks formula systematically under-scored heavier lifters. The table below is the actual DOTS distribution for male 83 kg raw lifters at age 30, computed from the OpenPowerlifting public dataset. A "good" DOTS for an intermediate raw lifter in this cohort sits around 395 (the 50th percentile); above 500 is regional-meet competitive.
DOTS distribution · male, 83 kg raw, age 30 · n = 326 lifters · OpenPowerlifting snapshot 2026-04 · CC0 (openpowerlifting.org)
| Percentile |
Total (kg) |
DOTS |
Reads as |
| 5th | 442.5 | 300.2 | novice raw |
| 25th | 522.5 | 354.5 | club lifter |
| 50th | 582.5 | 395.2 | intermediate |
| 75th | 646.9 | 438.9 | regional |
| 95th | 734.4 | 498.3 | national-class |
DOTS values derived from the listed totals using the Konertz / BVDK 2019 polynomial for male 83 kg. The "reads as" column is descriptive shorthand, not a federation classification. See the full per-cohort breakdown in rankings.
Where the percentiles come from
The competition cohort is the OpenPowerlifting CC0 dataset (snapshot 2026-04, ~141,000 raw-lifter records), segmented by sex, per-year age (15–80), IPF bodyweight class, and equipment. The recreational cohort is StrengthLevel's self-reported gym-logger pool, 153M+ entries, bodyweight × age tables combined multiplicatively (no calibration applied). The general-population cohort uses the ACFT 3-rep hex-bar deadlift converted to a conventional barbell 1RM via a 0.92 factor (Swinton, Lloyd, Keogh, Agouris 2011, PMID 21659894), with an age curve drawn from NHANES 2011–2014 grip strength as a multi-joint strength proxy.
Full cohort-cell widening rules and source links live in rankings and method; the static reference page is faq.
Seven formulas are computed in parallel and the spread is surfaced as a ±%: Epley, Brzycki, Mayhew (PMID 1614532), Lombardi, O'Conner, Wathan, and Lander. They disagree by roughly 8–12% at 5+ reps and narrower at low reps; showing all seven plus a min/max spread exposes that uncertainty instead of hiding it behind a single false-precision number. The Prilepin volume table is the Charniga translation of A. S. Medvedyev, A System of Multi-Year Training in Weightlifting (Sportivny Press, 1986).
Per-formula citations, validation studies (LeSuer et al. 1997), and the full Prilepin chart live in method; the static reference page is faq.
Where to start
New here? Start with BMI — it only needs height and weight. Add age and activity level and the calorie and macro calculators fill automatically from the same inputs.
- BMI calculator /bmi-calculator — height + weight, no age required
- TDEE calculator /tdee-calculator — add age + activity level
- Calorie calculator /calorie-calculator — cut / maintain / bulk targets
- Macro calculator /macro-calculator — protein · fat · carbs in grams
The lifting tools — 1RM, scores, rankings, and nutrition + strength retention — are in the same nav above.